With my request to use Google’s black-box Prediction APIs finally approved and a little time available in my schedule, I set out to see how well Google’s racks of CPUs would do against a few training sets I had in mind.
Ultimately, I was hoping to gain more insight into the question: Can software algorithms (with help from the crowd) predict what I’ll like in books, movies, web sites, and food?
To make this a manageable project, I limited the scope of my exercise to the modest problem of predicting amusing movie titles.
Wait, don’t laugh! I have some definite ideas on this subject, which I was able to compress into simple rules. For example, a number or date with an exclamation after it, funny! I’m tickled by these somewhat hypothetical movie titles:“Ten!”, “1941!”, or this real knee slapper, “22!”
I’m also similarly affected by titles with a man or woman’s name that ends in a vowel followed by an exclamation or question mark. “Ralphie?” Hilarious. “Albert.” Not funny. And titles with “Being”, as in “Being Ralphie”, are funny in a knowing, ironic way.
So how did Google’s mysterious Prediction oracle do ?Continue reading


On Friday, the FCC sent out a letter to Fox and Cablevision requesting both to state how they are meeting their statutory obligations ( “to negotiate in good faith”) over their current retransmission dispute. As Yankee fans are painfully aware, Cablevision and Fox had an agreement that expired on October 15 to carry WNYW, WWOR, and WTXF channels. Cablevision pulled its rebroadcasting of local MY 9 and Fox 5 television, which carries the Yankee games in the New York area, in a disagreement over its payments to Fox.