<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technoverse Blog &#187; SILK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technoverseblog.com/tag/silk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technoverseblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wideband Audio Anyone?</title>
		<link>http://technoverseblog.com/2010/05/wideband-audio-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://technoverseblog.com/2010/05/wideband-audio-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Telecom Patchboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[g.722]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gsm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SILK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TrFO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wideband audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technoverseblog.com/?p=1501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad I&#8217;m not the only curmudgeon who&#8217;s troubled by the state of 21st century audio! The lower quality of digitally compressed MP3 (compared to CD ) made the front page of yesterday&#8217;s New York Times. Economics and convenience are to &#8230; <a href="http://technoverseblog.com/2010/05/wideband-audio-anyone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I&#8217;m not the only  curmudgeon who&#8217;s troubled by the state of 21<sup>st</sup> century audio!  The lower  quality of digitally compressed MP3 (compared to CD ) <a id="e54x" title="made" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/10/business/media/10audio.html?scp=1&amp;sq=mobile%20sound%20quality&amp;st=Search">made</a> the front page of yesterday&#8217;s New York Times. Economics and convenience are to blame for the lossy, lower-sampled recording formats that are used to cram more tunes into our portable devices.</p>
<p>So  why are our cell phone conversations  still stuck with a slice of audio spectrum that dates to the 1930s?  I&#8217;ve written about a newer wide band codec (G.722 standard) that could deliver a far broader 7kHz of sound.  Unfortunately,  you&#8217;re  more likely to experience that on station-to-station calls in a large corporate environment (courtesy of Avaya, Cisco, and other enterprise players).</p>
<p>Outside of  the confines of an office park,  we&#8217;re all struggling to make ourselves heard over a skinny, tinny sounding 3.3kHz swath.  I found some of the answers as to why this is the case from a presentation given at this year&#8217;s eComm event.<span id="more-1501"></span></p>
<p>To be fair, as consumers it is possible to experience 12kHz of sound with a Skype-to-Skype connection using their  proprietary but royalty-free <a href="http://technoverseblog.com/2010/02/skype-will-add…dio-for-iphone/" target="_blank">SILK</a> codec. But for everyone else, the situation is less promising.</p>
<p>You would think since it  built its network almost from scratch,  the cellular industry would at least improve on the  legacy PSTN&#8217;s sound quality.  While searching for videos from eComm 2010, I   came across Dialogic&#8217;s Martyn Davies <a id="bw1g" title="talking" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMHzVSWeXAI">talking</a> about HD voice and the TDM dependencies that are still with us.</p>
<p>At about the 5:20 mark,  Davies has a slide showing why  wideband is difficult to implement in a real cell network.  The reason is that every part has to be upgraded—transmitting station, back haul,  core network.   The easiest part is upgrading the firmware in the cell  phone itself!</p>
<p>One way out of this, at least in UMTS-type networks (too many  acronyms, but UMTS is 3G for European and Japanese GSM systems), is  something called <a id="wm_n" title="TrFO" href="http://mobilesociety.typepad.com/mobile_life/2006/11/i_was_not_sure_.html">TrFO</a> (or transcoder free operation).  The magic that TrFO performs is to negotiate a codec end-to-end between cell phones,  thereby avoiding triggering transcoders within the network.</p>
<p>Because UMTS is packet based, it&#8217;s possible for the two cell phone to signal each other  in this fashion and communicate in wideband (forward to  8:13 in the  video for the explanation).</p>
<p>What about getting wide-band audio to work between  UMTS and everything else? The answer is a GSM peering standard called  <a href="http://transnexus.blogspot.com/2008/06/gsma-ipx.html">IPX</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as Davies points, it&#8217;s not all sweetness and light here.</p>
<p>In short: we will eventually get wide band  audio in the mobile world, but it will take some more hammering out of standards and agreements between carriers.</p>
<div style="margin:1em auto;display:block;width:560px;"><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMHzVSWeXAI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GMHzVSWeXAI&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technoverseblog.com/2010/05/wideband-audio-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skype Will Add Wideband Audio for iPhone</title>
		<link>http://technoverseblog.com/2010/02/skype-will-add-wideband-audio-for-iphone/</link>
		<comments>http://technoverseblog.com/2010/02/skype-will-add-wideband-audio-for-iphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Telecom Patchboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SILK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wideband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technoverseblog.com/?p=320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Skype is taking its time with a VoIP app that exploits the recently unlocked 3G data channel on the iPhone. But they have a pretty good reason. They&#8217;re working on adding their own SILK wideband audio codec to  a 3G &#8230; <a href="http://technoverseblog.com/2010/02/skype-will-add-wideband-audio-for-iphone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype is taking its time with a VoIP app that exploits the recently unlocked 3G data channel on the iPhone. But they have a pretty good reason. They&#8217;re working on adding their own <a href="https://developer.skype.com/silk">SILK wideband audio codec</a> to  a 3G version of their Apple App Store software. The SILK codec reproduces audio within a 8- 12 kHz bandwidth,  far better than the stingy spectrum slice we experience on our landline and mobile phones.</p>
<p>Is wideband audio worth the trouble? <span id="more-320"></span></p>
<p>For various reasons, phone audio quality has remained the same since the 1950s&#8211; a  <a href="http://communication.howstuffworks.com/telephone6.htm">3.4 Khz</a> sliver of sound.  We&#8217;re living in an age of ubiquitous digital MP3 — a codec that captures and plays back music in the 20 kHz range— and our phones are limited by by industrial age technology based on inductors and copper loops.</p>
<p>The sound we hear from our  phone ear piece is experienced  as merely adequate because most, but not all, of the important information embedded in human speech is contained within a 3.4 kHz spectrum slice.  Our phone network is engineered to effectively filter out critical higher frequency information that&#8217;s used by our brain&#8217;s audio circuits to decode human speech waveforms.</p>
<p>These missing frequency &#8220;bumps&#8221; (called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formant">formants</a> ,which were discovered in the 1960s) make it especially difficult for listeners to distinguish between consonants, especially &#8220;s&#8221; and &#8220;f&#8221; and &#8220;m&#8221; and &#8220;n&#8221;.</p>
<p>And I won&#8217;t event discuss what the phone network does to music&#8211; it&#8217;s practically unlistenable.</p>
<p>So the answer is Y E S. Wideband audio is worth it.</p>
<p>For those who say that there&#8217;s no market and people won&#8217;t notice the difference: there were also some naysayers who claimed consumers would rather drink the diner swill than spend $1.50 for freshly brewed Ethiopian coffee.</p>
<p>The technology is  available. The big stumbling blocks to greater wideband usage are that both sending and receiving devices must use the same or similar codecs, the digital signal processing software for sampling waveforms.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s where Skype has an advantage. With over a half-billion subscribers and SILK (which, by the way, is now a  <a href="http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2009/03/silk_now_available_for_free.html">royalty-free download</a> for developers), they have an enormous opportunity to jump start wideband.</p>
<p>This may also give Skype a nice, albeit temporary, advantage as they move into the <a href="http://technoverseblog.com/2010/02/skype-is-your-next-office-phone-system/" target="_blank">business phone market</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://technoverseblog.com/2010/02/skype-will-add-wideband-audio-for-iphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

